Pricing is always more interesting to Finance than anything else they could be doing. Believe me. I’ve been in Finance. ….. End-to-End Pricing: Steps 8 & 9


Step 8 – Financial Objectives

Financial Objectives – such as Revenue Growth, GM% expansion, Opex, PBT, ROIC v time – need to be reconciled with the List Price Positioning Strategy

This is an interactive process with Finance, but the outcome should not be dictated by Finance.

Finance unilaterally & arbitrarily setting unrealistic financial goals in their annual target setting process is typically the second biggest cause of “pricing issues†that I come across.

 

Step 9 – Integrated Financial Plan

Planned list prices and discounting should be rolled into a product-based financial plan along with new products introductions & discontinuations, product cost plan and demand plan.

Compare the outcome with your financial objectives. Then re-iterate ….

Make sure that your pricing plan is baked into Finance’s “official†financial plan or at least consistent with it.

Make this a joint exercise with Finance who typically will be willing to get involved because working on pricing is always more interesting than anything else they could be doing. Believe me. I’ve been in Finance.

Extract from “10 Steps to Creating End-to-End Pricing” in April 2016 edition of The Pricing Advisor, authored by Paul Charlton of The Pricing Factory®.

Read the paper.

  • The Pricing Advisor is the monthly publication of the Professional Pricing Society, The World’s Leading Association Dedicated to Pricing Management.
  • This is the second article of Paul’s that the Professional Pricing Society has published. Read the paper in slideshow format …..
  • Any questions, please contact [email protected]

 

Do you have a “You Gotta Haggle” pricing strategy? ….. End-to-End Pricing: Steps 5, 6 & 7


Step 5 – Deal Analysis

Deal Analysis will start to give insight where there is over-discounting and under-discounting, how consistent or – more likely – inconsistent the discounting is. This is where most of the opportunities are.

This will also inform the List Price Positioning Strategy, List Price Plan and ….

 

 

Step 6 – Discounting Policy & Programs

The conclusions from the Deal Analysis should be taken forward to create/update the Discounting Policy & Programs.

In most organizations this involves establishing a rational, policy-based approach to discounting which allows Sales to focus on “selling the valueâ€.

Typically this will be a move away from a “You Gotta Haggle†strategy.

Additional discretionary discounting programs should be designed so that they are only given in exchange for something which helps your business achieve its goals.

Contractual discounts for channel partners should be designed to reflect the tasks that the partner is contracted to perform in reselling your product.

The policy should include bid escalation criteria, process & SLA (Service Level Agreement).

The Discounting Policy & Programs should be aligned with the List Price Positioning Strategy & List Price Plan.

Step 7 – Sales Comp

Sales Compensation should be designed in order to support the execution of the Discounting Policy & Programs and the attainment of the business plan.

Importantly this should not be left to Sales – or even worse, the GM or CEO – to design unilaterally. Sales Comp needs to be consistent with all the other elements of End-to-End Pricing.

Extract from “10 Steps to Creating End-to-End Pricing” in April 2016 edition of The Pricing Advisor, authored by Paul Charlton of The Pricing Factory®.

Read the paper.

  • The Pricing Advisor is the monthly publication of the Professional Pricing Society, The World’s Leading Association Dedicated to Pricing Management.
  • This is the second article of Paul’s that the Professional Pricing Society has published. Read the paper in slideshow format …..
  • Any questions, please contact [email protected]

 

List Price Positioning Strategy, Value Proposition & List Price Plan ….. End-to-End Pricing: Steps 2, 3 & 4


Step 2 – List Price Positioning Strategy

Once you’ve worked out where you are competitively, it then becomes much easier to work out where you would like to be through probably applying nothing more than common sense – deductive reasoning – which is generally a lot cheaper, quicker and more useful than any market research that could be conducted.

Good GMs, Sales VPs/Directors and Product Managers/VPs typically know where they need to be positioned: they just need a bit of help articulating it.

Also be aware that an LPPS is reactive metric (“you know, they move and then we follow themâ€) so it’s very easy to stumble from being a price-leader into being a price-follower without realizing it. So to avoid this, you will also need some proactive metrics in your Pricing Strategy.

The LPPS should be in a presentable format and include a brief written rationale for every element in the strategy so the purpose of the price positioning can be easily explained to management for their approval, and to Sales for development into sales tools to communicate value to customers.

Step 3 – Value Proposition

The List Price Positioning Strategy needs to be consistent with and informed by the Value Proposition at multiple business and product levels.

The Value Prop needs to be appropriate for target market/segmentation, and implicitly captures how the business expects to create value for its customers.

There is an implication here that the Value Proposition needs to be meaningful – again, if I didn’t need to say this, I wouldn’t.

At a product level, insisting that the value proposition is:

  • quantitative – usually helps focus a product manager’s mind, or if it is
  • qualitative – include superlatives or comparatives which are independently verifiable

OK, so this section doesn’t have very many words in it. But there again, neither should your Value Prop. Succinctness and relevance are the keys to a successful Value Prop. The best one I came across was citable by the CEO. Another was developed by the CIO, not product management.

Step 4 – List Price Plan

Now list price changes can be planned. This is where the pricer starts to apply the paint to the canvas … chips away at that stone block …. puts quill to paper.

The overall approach to & rationale for the list price changes should be documented, not only so you can remember why you did what you did, but also so Sales don’t have to work out what you intended for themselves.

 

Extract from “10 Steps to Creating End-to-End Pricing” in April 2016 edition of The Pricing Advisor, authored by Paul Charlton of The Pricing Factory®. Read the paper.

  • The Pricing Advisor is the monthly publication of the Professional Pricing Society, The World’s Leading Association Dedicated to Pricing Management.
  • This is the second article of Paul’s that the Professional Pricing Society has published. Read the paper in slideshow format …..
  • Any questions, please contact [email protected]

 

“He lives in a very big house house for someone who puts the price tags on PCs in Best Buy” ….. End-to-End Pricing: Step 1


 

I told an old friend who had been a colleague of mine and had worked closely me with that “I was pleased to have been able to sort out the pricing for my client from “end-to-endâ€â€, and he replied that he had no idea what “end-to-end pricing†meant. Which made me think, if he doesn’t know what I meant, who does?

The purpose of the paper is to help pricing professionals explain to non-pricing executives and managers not only what “end-to-end pricing†is in a simplified, integrated 10-step program, but also articulate and visualize what pricing professionals create. So I am defining – for the purpose of this exercise – that the objectives of end-to-end pricing are to:

  • create competitive list prices and discount policies and guidelines which:
  • allow sales to be more efficient and focus on selling the value of the product …
  • … rather being margin managers or, even worse, sellers of deals for internal approval,
  • consistently apply your pricing strategy and price list positioning strategy,
  • align with your marketing, sales comp and financial plans;
  • All of which can be refreshed with a sustainable, efficient and repeatable process.

This is applicable to pretty much all B-2-B from those with one product to those with hundreds of thousands; small to large; regional to global; new to old; and particularly high tech.

If you like it’s like building a factory – a pricing factory – for prices & pricing processes, discounting policies and sales tools.

Step 1 – Competitive Analysis

I think this is the piece that everyone knows that pricing folks do – that is in between putting price tags on PCs in Best Buy as the parent of one of my daughter’s friends thought – but there are lots of opportunities for pratfalls. And I’ve seen some pratfalls in my time ….

The analysis needs to make sense and be easily understandable.

If it doesn’t instinctively make sense to your sales people, then there’s probably something wrong with it … and you’ll never be able to transform the analysis into a sales tool for communicating value to your customers.

The methodology and format needs to be consistent and repeatable … and timely.

If I didn’t need to mention any of this, obviously I wouldn’t.

Ah, and the link between qualitative and quantitative analysis is the valuation/$-ization of those previously qualitative, subjective valuations …. everyone’s favorite topic. But for a lot of businesses, those valuations are the reason – not a reason, the reason – why the business exists, or is able to command a premium. So you gotta learn to love them … even if you don’t like them.

Extract from “10 Steps to Creating End-to-End Pricing” in April 2016 edition of The Pricing Advisor, authored by Paul Charlton of The Pricing Factory®. Read the paper.

  • The Pricing Advisor is the monthly publication of the Professional Pricing Society, The World’s Leading Association Dedicated to Pricing Management.
  • This is the second article of Paul’s that the Professional Pricing Society has published. Read the paper in slideshow format …..
  • Any questions, please contact [email protected]

 

“10 Steps to Creating End-to-End Pricing” has now been published by the Professional Pricing Society …


 

  •  … in April 2016 edition of The Pricing Advisor, authored by Paul Charlton of The Pricing Factory®. Read the paper.
  • The Pricing Advisor is the monthly publication of the Professional Pricing Society, The World’s Leading Association Dedicated to Pricing Management.
  • The purpose of this article is to help pricing professionals explain to non-pricing executives and managers not only what “end-to-end pricing†is in a simplified, integrated 10-step program, but also articulate and visualize what pricing professionals create.
  • This is the second article of Paul’s that the Professional Pricing Society has published. Read the paper in slideshow format …..
  • Any questions, please contact [email protected]

 

Pricing: which other discipline would give you a B+ for being smart enough to be a “Don’t Know”?


Knowing that you “Don’t Know” – and having the courage to admit it – can often be a very smart option. The best option – rather obviously – is to be able to calculate the correct answer, but in many situations including this one, the next best alternative is to know when you don’t know and be prudent enough to say so. In this case 17% of the respondents in this research would – in my view – get a B+ for being smart enough to admit that they “Don’t Know”. Let me explain.

If most people had answered this simple question correctly the “Don’t Knows” wouldn’t get a B+. They would just get a F for not getting the answer correct because the realistic expectation would be that they should be able to get it right, after all, most people did. But in this case only 4% of respondents got the answer correct so the expectation is very different.

And before we go any further – given that 79% of the respondents attempted to estimate the answer and got it wrong, of which 75% of them got it “strongly” wrong – I think it might be worth interjecting that there is an exact answer to the question posed. You know like 2 + 2 does have a unique and exact answer, which, by the way, isn’t 3 which sounds ridiculous to say it, but that’s not dissimilar in business terms from what the majority of the respondents in this research came up with when answering this simple pricing question.

Now let’s contrast the B+ execs – the “Don’t Knows” – with the 75% who thought that they knew the answer while they clearly didn’t, yet nevertheless guessed wildly and – as it turned out – inaccurately at the answer. Before we do though let’s also note that 74% of the 75% “strongly underestimated” – and only 1% “strongly overestimated” – the impact of a price reduction. That’s a hugely significant bias.

And what’s the consequence? Well, the 74% will be much more likely to cut prices which have a hugely negative impact on their own business and also probably run the risk of inadvertently starting a price war with negative consequences for their entire industry. That’s why I’d grade them an “F”: the consequences of strongly underestimating the answer to this question in business are serious and far reaching.

This reminds me somewhat of Joe McNally, country manager of Compaq UK, who was somewhat anxious at the prospect of hiring another MBA who might think that they knew everything but in fact didn’t. And I think this excellent research from Simon-Kucher & Partners shows why he was right to be worried. His encouragement to me on my first day at Compaq was, “If you don’t know, just say you don’t know. No-one will mind.  We far prefer you say that you don’t know than you pretend that you do, and screw it up for everyone”. Wise words indeed.

 

Only 4% of execs got a simple pricing question correct: 92% weren’t even close. So what can you do about it?


  1. Don’t Panic. See how pricing advice – even if it is lifted from HHGTTG – is working already and feels pretty good.
  2. Realize that you don’t need to know all the answers. You just need a pricing expert who does.
  3. Don’t have a pricing expert? Call one ….

Paul’s Pricing Dictionary: Re-present, an illustration


I was asked if I could give an example of a deal which had been “Re-presented”.

Here’s are two simplified (fictional) deals:

DEAL 1 Region 1 Region 2 Region 3 Region 4
Product 1 15% 10% 20% 15%
Product 2 25% 35% 35% 25%
Product 3 40% 35% 40% 40%

and

DEAL 2 Region A Region B Region C Region D
Product A 40% 40% 40% 35%
Product B 35% 25% 25% 35%
Product C 20% 15% 15% 10%

Which is the better deal for the customer? Deal 1 or Deal 2?

Scroll down for the answer …..

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

They are the same deal.

Deal 2 looks better because it has been presented with the larger discounts in the top-left hand corner of the matrix. Using this approach certainly placated one customer who it turned out was becoming unhinged by the first discount which met their eye as it was presented in Deal 1: 15%. And then by time they got to the second number  – 10% – they were no longer rational. Conversely when Deal 2 was presented they immediately thought that 40% was a huge improvement over the 15% – even though they knew they were for different products. In their mind they had characterized Deal 1 as 15%, and Deal 2 as 40%. And they thought, in the same way that probably everyone does, that they were a sophisticated, rational and objective purchaser.

Pricing still a mystery to most people: 9 out of 10 executives strongly underestimate or do not know the impact of price reductions


In a study by IE Business School & Simon-Kucher & Partners, 1,225 executives from all industries were asked: “With a profit margin of 20%, how much does the volume of a product need to increase in order to compensate for a price reduction of 10%?” Only 4% estimated the answer correctly. 74% strongly underestimated the answer and 17% didn’t know.

Presented at a Professional Pricing Society webinar on 14th September, 2015 by Philip Daus of Simon-Kucher Partners.

Which category do you fall into?

error: Content is protected !!